sgusers的部落格

近年來，儲存赴泰旅遊十分熱門，李先生也報團參加了泰國游。結果他在旅遊期間的波折遭遇，堪稱現實版“泰囧”，於是回國後的李先生一紙訴狀將旅行社訴至海澱法院，而旅行社也提出反訴要求李先生補交拖欠費用。近日，經法院多次調解，雙方最終握手言和。7天游 遇連環“囧”事今年“國慶”長假，李先生參加了某旅行社的“泰國七日游精品團”。第一天，由於飛機晚點，原本當晚安排觀看的“人妖表演”未能如期成行，加之隨後一系列行程安排緊湊，不少團員抱怨太累，當地負責接待的地接社則沒有安排補看“人妖表演”。於是李先生獨自去看了一場“人妖表演”，地接社以系自費觀看為由，未予報銷。隨後途中，李先生在一次下車拍照時，因大巴車換車，其裝滿衣物的行李箱被隨之拉走。尋找未果後，只穿著短衣短褲的李先生找到地接社，但對方認為已在下車前提醒過遊客拿好隨身行李，因此責任應在李先生自己，不過最終還是為李先生購買了幾身秋裝供其換洗。起訴旅行社 遭對方反訴7天的旅程很快過去，旅行團在準備回國時，又遭遇航班調整提前飛走的窘境，全團只得改簽第二天的飛機。當晚，地接社安排在機場附近住宿，並要求團員自行承擔住宿費，在遭到拒絕後，地接社最終承擔了該筆住宿費。回國後，早已身心疲憊的李先生卻又因航班延誤沒能趕上公司的重要會議，被扣罰了200元。在找旅行社交涉未果後，李先迷你倉憤而將對方訴至法院，要求退還“人妖表演”的費用、行李丟失的損失、延誤航班的誤工費及精神損失費共計2萬余元。而旅行社也提出反訴，要求李先生返還地接社為其購買衣物的1400泰銖及最後一晚的住宿費500元。經法院多次調解，最終雙方達成協議，握手言和。法官提示 旅行前明確約定“出境游”過程中，交通工具延誤是旅遊消費者經常遇到的情況。實際上，因飛機、火車、班輪等公共交通延誤，導致旅遊合同中約定的日程不能如期履行的，消費者有權要求旅行社退還未實際發生的項目費用，但如果旅行社已經提前支付了該筆費用且承接者不予退還，則旅行社也有權不退還，但應當提供證據證明，否則仍應退還。然而，如因公共交通延誤等不可抗力因素，導致消費者增加吃住行等相關費用甚至消極減少財產，如李先生受到處罰扣款，消費者則無權直接向旅行社索賠，旅行社應當協助消費者向公共承運人索賠。至於因天氣、戰亂、罷工等因素致使公共交通延誤造成損失，消費者與旅行社之間應當公平分擔損失。當然，如果在旅遊合同中特別約定此種情況由旅行社承擔，消費者則有權要求旅行社承擔。因此法官提示，鑒於“出境游”的諸多不可預見因素，消費者應當在簽訂合同時，特別關注公共交通、不可抗力及意外事件條款，儘量事前對風險及損失分擔進行明確約定，以免日後與旅行社發生爭議時無依據可循。晨報記者 彭小菲儲存倉

mini storage 線路名稱：北方玫瑰———泰國清邁美食深度5天團行程特色：符合中國旅遊法標準，全程無購物、無自費；夜游夜間野生動物園，近距離接觸動物，夜游湄濱河品船上泰式風味晚餐，獨家安排清邁小清新之地寧曼路“歐陸風情街”，玩轉3D錯覺藝術A rt in Para-dise天堂藝術。出發日期：1月30日參考價：5990元/人(價格包括全程旅遊費用，泰國旅遊簽証費用，導遊服務費) 線路提供：世紀假日國際旅行社迷你倉

年底將至，迷你倉樂器八大公股行庫已完成對明年人力需求的初步評估，保守估計，明年八大行庫擬對外求才人數合計將突破1,200人，其中以第一銀行新徵300名，求才規模比今年多出一倍，位居八大行庫之冠。一銀高層指出，明年大舉擴張求才，除了屆齡等離退職人員的人力彌補，最主要是大中華及東南亞地區海外拓點的需求，由於內部加快海外分行派員的腳步，預估未來國內分行人力將會不足。此外，財富管理人力也有待補強，因此明年招考的新進人力比起今年足足多出150人。一銀高層說明，明年擬招考的300名新進人力，除了其中約三分之二名額開放應屆畢業生報考，另外近三分之一名額將要求一定程度的語文能力、專業執照或業務經驗。其中包括財管人員明年擬徵才50人、法務人員其中有四至五名要求有律師資格，另外在金融交易、國際貿易融資、理財規劃等將要求有業務經驗。至於MA，一銀表示，語文方面要求將更趨嚴格，今年已要求TOEIC成績須在850分以上，明年標準將更高。華銀與兆豐銀明迷你倉西貢擬對外招考人數則各約250人、近200人；台銀、土銀、合庫、彰銀、台企銀等的人數則大約在75∼130人左右，主要人力需求，將以資訊、法務，以及財富管理為主。行庫主管指出，最主要是因應銀行前進第三方支付、行動支付等因應新科技，及衍生性金融商品等業務開發，以及國內外監理機關越益要求法遵監理等因素。土銀與合庫指出，明年對外招考的人力，主要是以北部分行的需求為主，土銀指出，大台北及桃竹苗的行員流動率較高，南部人力資源北調也必須考慮員工意願，因此擬透過明年對外招考來彌補北部人力的不足。合庫今年因為推動分行整併，僅招考GA等約40名人力，不過合庫評估之後亦認為北部分行人力有補強的需要，因此，明年已規劃招考100名左右行員，將以資訊、法務、理財等為主。合庫內部也評估，通常國內銀行業對北部的中大型分行大約配置25∼30人，小型分行則約15∼16人，合庫若與一般同業水準相較，平均大約有兩至三人的差距，因此希望透過明年招考新進人員改善。迷你倉將軍澳

　　■商家在美食節上用石磨展示傳統的磨制豆腐的方法。新快報記者 寧彪/攝　　新快報訊 記者程貴三報道 由海珠區政府主辦的海珠美食節昨日開幕，儲存倉場地設在樂峰廣場，有82個攤位，可品嘗到粵菜、潮菜以及全國各地特色美食小吃，還能欣賞歌舞和魔術表演。活動為期9天，于12月22日結束。　　昨日天空飄著小雨，但美食攤位前人氣依然比較旺。記者上午10時半到達，看到不少市民帶著小孩來迷你倉最平，一些攤位前已經排起長隊。此次參展的不乏知名企業，炳勝、新興、金城潮州、佛山盲公丸等酒家和企業都來設攤。借著美食節的人氣，樂峰廣場的商家也舉行優惠活動，飛揚影城推出35元看電影的體驗券，永旺超市免費辦理會員卡等，還有歌舞和魔術表演，打造成美食購物嘉年華。　　記者瞭解到，市民可乘坐地鐵八號線和二十多條公交線路直達活動現場，還有600個停車位在活動期間免費提供使用。程貴三迷你倉

衛福部食品藥物管理署近日在邊境檢出一批從國外進口的橄欖粕油疑含銅葉綠素，迷你倉目前尚待複驗確認；食藥署長葉明功指出，若進口油品確實被檢出含銅葉綠素，代表部分進口油在國外就已添加銅葉綠素。食藥署副署長姜郁美表示，這批純橄欖粕油是邊境管制後，首批被檢出含銅葉綠素的油品，目前仍在海關，未流入市面，預計月底複驗結果出爐，而此批油品的進口商，之前進行市售油品稽查時就曾有違規紀錄。泰山、福壽等油品大廠旗下葡萄籽油，之前陸自存倉被檢出含銅葉綠素，但業者喊冤未添加，懷疑油品恐在國外就已「染綠」。衛福部11月中啟動邊境管制，凡進口橄欖油、葡萄籽油須檢附官方不含銅葉綠素證明，才准輸台，迄今邊境約輸入10多批橄欖油、橄欖粕油。泰山、福壽等油廠先前旗下油品被檢出含有銅葉綠素，違規油品經查來自西班牙維多利亞（VIDORIA）公司。姜郁美說，實施邊境管制以來，維多利亞公司尚無報關紀錄，西班牙官方已著手調查油品中銅葉綠素來源，但尚未提供調查報告。迷你倉

mini storage epaper.ynet.com/html/2013-12/15/content_30372.htm?div=-1...本報訊（記者 藺麗爽）下周二，歷時半年的第七屆中國北京永定河文化節將在門頭溝影劇院舉行閉幕式。門頭溝區旅遊委表示，被譽為“...儲存

香港文匯報訊 據中新網報道，迷你倉最平隨�嫦娥三號落月成功，國際天文界一直期待能將「天文台」架設在月球上的夢想，料將變為現實。據月球科學領域專家介紹，在月亮上觀天文是世界上很多天文學家最想做的事情之一，「嫦三」搭載的八台有效載荷中，月基光學望遠鏡，相當於人類把「天文台」架到了月球上。在月球觀測天空，研究星系、恆星的活動。據了解，重約10多公斤的月基光學望遠鏡由主體和反射鏡轉台兩大部分組成。光先進入望遠鏡掃描鏡，再經反射鏡進入望遠鏡鏡頭。它負責月晝期間在近紫外波段對各種天體的亮度及變化進行觀測。免受大氣影響 數據精度更高對於這台外界關注的「神秘儀器」，月基光學望遠鏡主任設計師魏建彥透露，迷你倉基光學望遠鏡有兩個特點，第一它不完全是搖控，而是通過地面系統發去一個命令自主展開；第二是選擇了一個叫極紫外的波段，這個波段在地球上不可能完成，必須要空間去完成。這個波段對一些星體的突然爆發現象非常敏感。「在月球上觀測深空有兩大優勢！」月基光學望遠鏡副主任設計師阮萍指出，一是月球自轉比地球緩慢，自轉一周需要27天多，可對一個目標開展長達300多小時的持續跟蹤。二是避開大氣影響，可以獲得極高精度的觀測數據。「尤其在地球上無法實現近紫外波段的深空觀測，都被大氣吸收了。據悉，作為中國探月工程獨有的「秘方」，月基光學望遠鏡所觀測到的物體，中國不會「獨享」，整個國際天文界均可共享探測資料。mini storage

The authorities have implemented "cooling-off measures" in the wake of last Sunday's Little India riot, which include a ban on alcohol sale and consumption in the Serangoon Road area.儲存So far, these measures are temporary. They are aimed at restoring order and giving affected communities "time and space to recover" from the incident.Even as the dust settles, however, it is worth thinking about whether there is a need for longer-term measures to control drinking in public.Singapore may seem to many like a nation of rules, yet the country is relatively tolerant on this issue.Over the past two decades or so, a plethora of bars and pubs have sprung up in enclaves such as Clarke Quay, Boat Quay, Dempsey Hill and Robertson Quay. Watering holes have also emerged in heartland suburban areas, as well as public parks such as Punggol Park and Bishan Park.In fact, booze is readily available at any 24-hour convenience store or supermarket, and anyone can buy it and head to the Botanic Gardens or East Coast Park for an afternoon picnic.As far as imposing controls on drinking in public goes, the regime here is far more liberal than many places abroad, some with long-established drinking cultures.In 2001, Britain amended its Police and Criminal Justice Act to give local councils power to address alcohol-related crime and disorder.This is done through what is known as Designated Public Place Orders (DPPO), which give police officers discretionary powers to require a person to stop drinking and confiscate alcohol or containers of alcohol in certain public zones.Once a DPPO zone is in place, police can seize alcohol from anyone who is not on licensed premises, even if the bottles or cans are unopened.Although drinking is not banned in the zones, police can ask anyone to stop drinking and it is an offence to refuse, punishable by a maximum ¢G500 (S$1,027) fine. No explanation or suspicion that the person could be a public nuisance is required.According to an article in The Times newspaper in 2009, more than 700 "controlled drinking zones" have been set up across England, and the local authorities were introducing the zones at a rate of 100 yearly.Some zones even cover an entire city, such as Coventry and Brighton, encompassing even the quiet suburban streets.The DPPO system has been criticised by many who see it as excessive regulation. Some have claimed that the police have applied the laws too aggressively, confiscating wine from families having outdoor picnics.Meanwhile, in most parts of the United States, it is illegal to possess or consume an open container of alcohol in a public space such as on a street.Drinking in a moving car is also not allowed, even if the person drinking is just a passenger.Exceptions to the rule are rare but drinking is allowed on certain occasions, such as at a sporting event or tailgate party - a session organised around the op迷你倉n tailgate of a truck.In order to get around the strict rules in the US, many famously drink alcohol out of bottles in brown paper bags. This is done because if law enforcers cannot actually see the alcohol, they cannot prove a crime was committed.Finally, most states in Australia have laws where it is an offence to drink alcohol in public without a permit.In Melbourne, the consumption of alcohol is banned in public places in the Central Business District and major events held on nearby streets and reserves are declared alcohol-free.In Perth, the same ban covers areas such as the streets, parks and beaches and those caught flouting the law face a A$200 (S$224) fine.People generally abide by the laws and it is a rare sight to see anyone on the streets with a booze bottle in hand.In the same city, it also is an offence for staff of licensed premises to sell or supply alcohol to drunken people.Entry to such venues, which may include bars and nightclubs, can also be refused if someone is deemed to be drunk.There are no such laws affecting nightspots here but the Health Promotion Board (HPB) last year started a workshop to train staff of drinking establishments to identify signs of excessive drinking.During each 4 1/2-hour-long "Responsible Service of Alcohol" workshop, participants are taught to delay, handle or stop serving alcohol to drunk patrons.So far, HPB has trained 281 people, including wait staff, bartenders and floor managers from 18 entertainment outlets, including restaurants and hotels.There are public drinking rules in many other countries too, including Canada, Hungary, Finland, Norway, Poland and Spain.Some are blanket bans while others impose restrictions on certain built-up areas.At a time when the Government is looking at proposals on a ban on alcohol consumption at common areas, it may be worth looking more closely at where countries have been successful and where they have not, in imposing such restrictions.What are some of the takeaways from this overseas experience?One is that the police should be given special powers to stop people from drinking or to confiscate alcohol if necessary. But care needs to be taken in the actual enforcement of the law on the ground.In the Singapore context, a blanket nationwide ban on public consumption of alcohol is probably excessive and unnecessary.After all, for most public places like void decks and parks, the odd jaunt by individuals with a few beers rarely turns into a melee.But while the authorities could consider imposing "no-alcohol zones" initially at certain problem pockets, the areas should not be based on stereotypes.The emphasis must be on the safety of the general public - and that message needs to be made clear to all.Let's stay rational, realistic and responsible in plotting the way forward and not let one bad incident pave the way for even more discontent.sujint@sph.com.sgself storage

　　備受矚目的第十五屆北大光華新年論壇將于2013年12月21日在北京大學百周年紀念講堂舉行，self storage本次論壇的主題為“新經濟 新變革 新時代”。論壇將聚焦十八屆三中全會改革新政，研判當前中國經濟發展態勢、前瞻未來中國改革圖景。　　本屆論壇旨在進一步促進來自各不同行業精英之間的深層次對話，總體把握中國經濟發展的未來趨勢，為各位參與者提供一個高端的交流平台，以共同探討如何打造中國經濟升級版，釋放改革紅利，助力經濟發展。　　北京大學光華管理學院名譽院長厲以寧、中國社會科學院副院長李揚將出席開幕論壇並發表主題演講；北京大學光華管理學院院長蔡洪濱等學界、商界名家將高峰對話，激蕩思想光華。　　活動當天，上午的開幕論壇之外，下午將並行四場分論壇，從“變革下的中國新金融——助推中國經濟，釋放改革紅利”“新文化運動在今天——變革中的文化產業”“平台與生態——商業模式的顛覆性創新”“城鎮化再破題”等四個不同的角度討論各自領域內的新經濟、新變革、新時代。因思想 而光華　　釋疑解惑、研以致用、經世濟民，一直是北京大學光華管理學院的學術使命；澄清問題、消除歧義、避免誤判，為宏觀經濟穩定政策的形成盡綿薄之力，是北京大學光華管理學院的孜孜追求；運用國際規範的研究方法深入研究中國的經濟和管理問題，做有世界水平的中國學問，培養有國際眼光的學界領袖，更是每一個光華人的基本信念。　　這種“因思想，而光華”之情懷的集中體現正是一年一度盛大的北大光華新年論壇。新年論壇是中國經濟管理學界最有影響力的論壇之一。每屆論壇緊扣社會經濟形勢和重大管理議題，邀請有關政府高層領導、著名企業家和傑出學者與會發表見解，與北大師生共享思想盛宴。經過十五年的悉心耕耘，北大光華新年論壇已經成為中國最具權威性和前瞻性的思想交流盛會和最具影響力的公開學術論壇之一，得到了社會的廣泛關注與認可。　　北大光華新年論壇創辦于1998年，由北京大學光華管理學院主辦。北大光華新年論壇每次圍繞一個緊扣中國經濟發展與企業管理的重大主題，邀請來自政府、學術、工商各界精英人士與會發表見解，與北大師生共享思想盛宴。　　歷屆論壇主題涵蓋了WTO對中國企業的影響、金融危機後的中國經濟、經濟發展方式轉變和國有企業改革等當年中國經濟面臨的重要課題，為中國經濟的快速、平穩、可持續發展貢獻可供�迪的智慧。思長遠 行更遠　　2013年，注定是不平凡的一年。兩會之後，新政府履新。思想準備、輿論準備和組織準備基本完成之後，深化改革之舉呼之欲出。十八屆三中全會公報出台，對在新的歷史起點上全面深化改革做出戰略部署，在理論上有一系列重大創新，在實踐上有一系列重大突破，為實現中華民族偉大復興的中國夢，勾勒出改革路線圖和時間表。　　在此關鍵節點，第十五屆北大光華新年論壇將于2013年12月21日在北京大學百周年紀念講堂舉辦。本次論壇的主題為“新經濟 新變革 新時代”，將聚焦十八屆三中全會改革新政，研判當前中國經濟發展態勢、前瞻未來中國改革圖景。　　除設嘉賓陣容強大的主論壇之外，第十五屆北大光華新年論壇還將設四場分論壇，深度研讀當前中國熱點，深入思考改革發展之路。　　分論壇一將聚焦“新思維 新模式”，探討“平台與生態——商業模式的顛覆性創新”。　　為什麼萬達在地產行迷你倉能夠異軍突起？小米手機又是如何依靠“米粉”締造商業奇跡？全球最大的100 家企業里，有60 家企業的主要收入來自平台商業模式。在中國，平台商業模式也已經出現在越來越多的行業，不僅僅是互聯網，許多傳統行業如零售業、銀行業和地產業的企業都在利用平台商業模式獲利並持續擴大市場版圖。成功運用平台思維創新商業模式的企業往往顛覆了其所在行業的競爭模式，從而獲得了令對手難以超越的競爭優勢。　　面對新生代商業模式來襲，企業應該如何突破既定思維框架，設計有效的商業模式以獲取競爭優勢？商業模式創新對於組織能力的要求是什麼？企業轉型過程中應該鍛造什麼樣的領導力？這些問題正成為越來越多有志于商業模式創新的企業家日夜思考的話題。本場論壇將圍繞商業競爭的新思維展開，給予你有關新生代商業模式的前沿洞見，顛覆你的思維。　　分論壇二將目光投向“新金融”，思考“變革下的中國新金融——助推中國經濟，釋放改革紅利”。　　要保持經濟的可持續增長，中國經濟實現轉型與升級是必由之路，這其中金融業的產業升級至關重要。如果將“新金融”作為金融業產業升級的代名詞，那麼它應該代表與實體經濟發展相適應的新市場、新業態、新模式、新產品。如何釋放中國金融改革的紅利，更好地服務于實體經濟發展？如何在有效監管的條件下讓市場開放成為完善金融市場體系的推動力量？新的金融業態是否可以給經濟帶來新的活力，成為產業結構調整的助推器？隨著經濟體制改革的深化，哪些金融機構和金融服務將獲得最大的市場空間？什麼樣的金融監管才能使新金融最大限度地發揮資源配置作用？這些都是需要我們認真思考的問題。期待共聚北大光華新年論壇，在中國金融業變革之時，與各位嘉賓共同開�思想碰撞之旅。　　分論壇三將關注“新文化”，研討“新文化運動在今天——變革中的文化產業”。　　文化產業作為一個多元化產業，涵蓋了包括影視傳媒、新聞出版、演藝娛樂、會展旅遊等多方面產業形態，伴隨著現今高新技術的不斷發展和海外思潮的不斷湧入，文化產業在形態、規模等方面產生的新變化呼喚著其在產業結構方面的進一步升級。蓬勃發展的同時如何駕馭幾何級數產生的如侵犯知識產權、市場不規範等問題，又應如何通過投資管理等新興手段進一步將文化產業推向新高度，12月21日，來北大光華，學界與業界精英共聚一堂，我們一起來聊聊“新文化運動在今天”。　　分論壇四將再度聚焦本年度最熱話題——“城鎮化再破題”。新一屆政府領導上任以來，城鎮化倍受矚目，希望通過推動城鎮化進程促進城市和城鎮的協調發展，實現中國經濟與社會的可持續發展。中國地域廣博，其經濟具有東中西部發展不平衡、城鄉二元結構體制等特點，這也讓土地制度改革、戶籍制度改革、社會保障制度改革等問題顯得更加微妙棘手，使得我國城鎮化既要有頂層設計，又需要因地制宜。應當如何破解城鎮化迷局？在實踐城鎮化過程中又有哪些經驗可以借鑒？企業在城鎮化過程中應當如何起到更加積極的作用？　　總結改革開放30餘年的成就與經驗，深刻認識中國經濟發展的問題與教訓，是理解下一步改革的基礎；正確解讀當前國內外經濟發展大勢和中央政策走向，是開�下一步改革的鑰匙；能否構建政府與市場的良性關係，則是下一步改革的重點和成敗的關鍵。“新經濟 新變革 新時代”，第十五屆北大光華新年論壇，敬請期待。迷你倉樂器

Source: Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, Calif.自存倉Dec. 14--ONTARIO -- Travelers at LA/Ontario International Airport no longer have to worry about being stranded without any dining options after officials have reconfigured the operating hours for the nearly dozen restaurants located in the twin terminals.Those extended hours do now also include vending machines, which will only open when the restaurants have closed for the evening, said Jess Romo, airport manager for ONT.?The commitment was to keep them open as long as we could,? said Romo who was referring to the terms of contract with one of the operators of its airport concessions, Delaware North.In October, it was announced that TGI Fridays was shutting down its location in Terminal 4, and Coffee Bean in Terminal 2 closed on Oct. 16. The menu is being offered in El Paseo but not as Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf, Los Angeles World Airport officials said.Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf is still in operation in Terminal 4.On the brighter side, El Paseo and Schlotzsky?s Deli will now remain open until 7 p.m. In the past it would close by 5 p.m. on the weekdays and by 2 p.m. on weekends.This is the scenario that has been unfolding at ONT as the facility has experienced a 40 percent drop in passenger traffic since 2007.Concession PactIn 2012, LAWA sought competitive bids from companies who could run airport concessions but were unable to draw interest, citing the uncertainties in passenger traffic as a leading issue. Instead it agreed to renew a short, two-year contract with Delaware North, typically these contracts are a minimum of seven years and could last anywhere between 15 to 20 years.Romo said LAWA will begin looking at the competitive bidding process next year. They will also most likely conduct a survey asking travelers about their dining preferences.?The most important thing right now is they are trying to make sure they are going to be profitable,? Romo said about the contract that was renewed.If airlines severely reduce their service at an airport, it is only a matter of time before concessionaires will reduce or eliminate their services. It?s a vicious cycle, said Peter Greenberg, a travel journalist and host of the show, ?The Travel Detective? on public television.?It doesn?t help, even if Los Angeles World Airports is trying to get the concessionaires, because they have no leverage. The leverage is the passengers,? Greenberg said.In the first ten months of the year, ONT had 3.2 million people travel in and out of the facility, a decrease of 9 percent from the same time period in 2012.?As you see airlines consolidate, they shrink capacity and the number of seats that are available. They pull out of airports that don?t have a high yield,? he said.Cities with airports like ONT have to get together and take control of their facilities by offering incentives,Greenberg suggests an agreement with an airline where residents and business community will commit to using that specific airline, and guaranteeing selling a certain amount of seats in the year. If they don?t meet the expectation, then the airline could tap into a fund set up to help with any shortfalls.?Unless they do that, they are gong to be very lonely very soon,? Greenberg said.Getting CreativeThat?s not all. Ontario is going to have to get creative and take advantage of all the empty space, he said.?Make it into a farmers market,? Greenberg said. ?You are not going to get people there based on the amount of traffic already. If you?ve got that space to fill, do a bold thing and turn it into a shopping destination.?Even though most of that emptiness is behind Transportation Security Adminstration security checkpoints迷你倉 Greenberg said the easy solution would be to reconfigure those gates to allow the public in.?It?s time for Ontario to be first on the block. What other choice do you have? You cannot depend on the airlines to save you, they are just trying to survive.?Romo didn?t discount the idea but said some security challenges could prevent that from ever becoming a reality.?Anything is possible if you put in enough money and energy into it,? Romo said.The challenge is that TSA currently only allows for ticketed passengers, and the checkpoint might just be too narrow to reconfigure without disrupting airport services. Another option would be to create a separate entrance to the other half of the terminals -- which have been shuttered for some time because of the lack of passengers. Romo said it could be a costly move and the airport would need to be guaranteed it would be a financial investment.Another concern is that it would increase public access to the airfield to a group of people who may or may not be screened at the security checkpoints, Romo added.?I think all airports have to look at ways to generate more revenues or save money,? he said.Adding a local flavorA solution at ONT might be to do away with contract operators, who have to pay extra costs for brand name restaurants or shops, and bring in local businesses, said Heather Perry with Klatch Coffee.Just a little over a year ago the owners of Klatch Coffee, which has coffeehouses in Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga, opened another location inside Terminal 7 at LAX. It did so through a partnership with Crews of California, an airport retailer.?It really comes down to the contract, the timing has to be all right,? said Perry, who helps oversee the business operations for the family company. ?Part of Ontario?s problem is that it?s really not a growing airport.?Perry said she has flown out of ONT in the past and recalled seeing the Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf would only have one person at the counter, even though there was at 25 people in line. That?s because after that 6 a.m. flight was out, there was no other business, she said. It didn?t make sense to have more staff.?Crews of California would probably never operate out of Ontario airport because the money is just not there,? she said. ?The LAX operation was an almost half a million. Crews could not do that in Ontario because they would not see that money back,? she said.Since opening at LAX, Perry said Klatch Coffee has been ?hugely successful,? seeing about 2,000 transactions a day at that location alone, Perry said.?I don?t even know if Ontario sees 2,000 people a day,? she added.Prior to the economic downturn, one of the contractors that ran airport concessions at ONT had looked at bringing in local businesses such as Joseph Filippi Winery, Romo said.The deal fell through because of the lack of travelers. In the future, in order to bring a local flavor to ONT, the deal would have to be just right for the business, Romo said.?I definitely think that?s something our airport should look at,? he said, although it would mostly likely be done through a concession operator.ONT may be ideal for travelers because of the relative ease to get in and out, and the lack of long lines. It is those exact reasons that may detract even local businesses from opening shop at ONT, Greenberg said.?Rents will be reflective of the traffic and the rent has to come down first,? he said. ?If there are not enough of people, what?s their upside??Copyright: ___ (c)2013 the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin (Ontario, Calif.) Visit the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin (Ontario, Calif.) at .dailybulletin.com Distributed by MCT Information Servicesmini storage